Code: 02021401
If a man born blind were to gain his sight in later life would he be able to identify the objects he saw around him? Would he recognise a cube and a globe on the basis of his earlier tactile experiences alone? This was William Mol ... more
English
You get 111 loyalty points
Book synopsis
If a man born blind were to gain his sight in later life would he be able to identify the objects he saw around him? Would he recognise a cube and a globe on the basis of his earlier tactile experiences alone? This was William Molyneux's famous question to John Locke and it was much discussed by English and French empiricists in the eighteenth century as part of the controversy over innatism and abstract ideas. Dr Morgan examines the whole history of this debate: Locke's own (negative) answer to the question, the contributions of Berkeley, Condillac, Diderot and Voltaire and the factual accounts of early cataract operations and modern laboratory studies. He shows how this debate is involved in the development and eventual separation of philosophy and experimental psychology after the eighteenth century and considers why the original question is effectively still unanswered. This is one problem-area with its intricate cluster of connected conceptual and technical difficulties which suggests the need for some reunion or at least collaboration between the two subjects.
Book details
Book category Books in English Society & social sciences Psychology Cognition & cognitive psychology
46.11 €
English
Collection points Bratislava a 13190 dalších
Copyright ©2008-26 najlacnejsie-knihy.sk All rights reservedPrivacyCookies
26384 collection points
Delivery 2.99 €
02/210 210 99 (8-15.30h)Shopping cart ( Empty )