Revolution by Judiciary / Najlacnejšie knihy
Revolution by Judiciary

Kód: 04634678

Revolution by Judiciary

Autor Jed Rubenfeld

Although constitutional law is supposed to be fixed and enduring, its central narrative in the twentieth century has been one of radical reinterpretation - Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, Bush v. Gore. What, if anything, ... celý popis

100.45


Skladom u dodávateľa
Odosielame za 14 - 18 dní
Pridať medzi želanie

Mohlo by sa vám tiež páčiť

Darčekový poukaz: Radosť zaručená
  1. Darujte poukaz v ľubovoľnej hodnote, a my sa postaráme o zvyšok.
  2. Poukaz sa vzťahuje na všetky produkty v našej ponuke.
  3. Elektronický poukaz si vytlačíte z e-mailu a môžete ho ihneď darovať.
  4. Platnosť poukazu je 12 mesiacov od dátumu vystavenia.

Objednať darčekový poukazViac informácií

Viac informácií o knihe Revolution by Judiciary

Nákupom získate 253 bodov

Anotácia knihy

Although constitutional law is supposed to be fixed and enduring, its central narrative in the twentieth century has been one of radical reinterpretation - Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, Bush v. Gore. What, if anything, justifies such radical reinterpretation? How does it work doctrinally? What, if anything, structures it or limits it? Jed Rubenfeld finds a pattern in American constitutional interpretation that answers these questions convincingly. He posits two different understandings of how constitutional rights would apply or not apply to particular legislation. One is that a right would be violated if certain laws were passed. The other is that a right would not be violated. He calls the former "Application Understandings" and the latter "No-Application Understandings." He finds that constitutional law has almost always adhered to all of the original Application Understandings, but where it has departed from history, as it did in the Brown decision, it has departed from No-Application Understandings. Specifically, the Fourteenth Amendment did not prohibit racial segregation, so Rubenfeld argues that the Supreme Court had no problem reinterpreting it to prohibit it. It was a No-Application Understanding. This is a powerful argument that challenges current theories of constitutional interpretation from Bork to Dworkin. It rejects simplistic originalism, but restores historicity to constitutional theorizing.

Parametre knihy

Zaradenie knihy Knihy po anglicky Law Laws of Specific jurisdictions Constitutional & administrative law

100.45

Obľúbené z iného súdka



Osobný odber Bratislava a 2642 dalších

Copyright ©2008-24 najlacnejsie-knihy.sk Všetky práva vyhradenéSúkromieCookies


Môj účet: Prihlásiť sa
Všetky knihy sveta na jednom mieste. Navyše za skvelé ceny.

Nákupný košík ( prázdny )

Vyzdvihnutie v Zásielkovni
zadarmo nad 59,99 €.

Nachádzate sa: