Denationalization vs. 'The Right to Have Rights' / Najlacnejšie knihy
Denationalization vs. 'The Right to Have Rights'

Kód: 04911538

Denationalization vs. 'The Right to Have Rights'

Autor Henry S. Matteo

The whole idea of citizenship with respect to its place in the history of the U.S. is brought into play in this case study, which argues that obligations and moral conduct, as integral elements of citizenship, merit greater attent ... celý popis

126.51

Dostupnosť:

50 % šancaMáme informáciu, že by titul mohol byť dostupný. Na základe vašej objednávky sa ho pokúsime do 6 týždňov zabezpečiť.
Prehľadáme celý svet

Informovať o naskladnení

Pridať medzi želanie

Mohlo by sa vám tiež páčiť

Darujte túto knihu ešte dnes
  1. Objednajte knihu a vyberte Zaslať ako darček.
  2. Obratom obdržíte darovací poukaz na knihu, ktorý môžete ihneď odovzdať obdarovanému.
  3. Knihu zašleme na adresu obdarovaného, o nič sa nestaráte.

Viac informácií

Informovať o naskladnení knihy

Informovať o naskladnení knihy


Súhlas - Odoslaním žiadosti vyjadrujem Súhlas so spracovaním osobných údajov na marketingové účely.

Zašleme vám správu akonáhle knihu naskladníme

Zadajte do formulára e-mailovú adresu a akonáhle knihu naskladníme, zašleme vám o tom správu. Postrážime všetko za vás.

Viac informácií o knihe Denationalization vs. 'The Right to Have Rights'

Nákupom získate 312 bodov

Anotácia knihy

The whole idea of citizenship with respect to its place in the history of the U.S. is brought into play in this case study, which argues that obligations and moral conduct, as integral elements of citizenship, merit greater attention than has been accorded them. The basic issues surrounding the citizenship concept are examined as to how it developed; what American statutory and constitutional provisions were relevant; and how the courts and administrative bodies interpreted those provisions. Also explored are issues such as: Why is citizenship important, and why is American citizenship viewed as a precious possession? Has the development of American citizenship been in step with the U.S. system of government? What has been the role of the U.S. Supreme Court in that development? Its 1967 ruling in Afroyim v. Rusk was the Court's leading case. For the first time, the Court held that Congress lacked the power of involuntary expatriation, that citizenship is a constitutional right under the Fourteenth Amendment, and that all the U.S. government can do is formally recognize an individual's voluntary renunciation or abandonment of citizenship. The argument in this study is that the Eighth Amendment, rather than the Fourteenth, would have provided not only a stronger base on which to rest the Afroyim decision, but would have supplied it with a moral dimension as well. The book details the expatriation case of Margaret J. Randall, prominent in academic and literary circles.

Parametre knihy

Zaradenie knihy Knihy po anglicky Society & social sciences Politics & government

126.51

Obľúbené z iného súdka



Osobný odber Bratislava a 2642 dalších

Copyright ©2008-24 najlacnejsie-knihy.sk Všetky práva vyhradenéSúkromieCookies


Môj účet: Prihlásiť sa
Všetky knihy sveta na jednom mieste. Navyše za skvelé ceny.

Nákupný košík ( prázdny )

Vyzdvihnutie v Zásielkovni
zadarmo nad 59,99 €.

Nachádzate sa: